Model results
GPT 4.1 Nano
Provider: OpenAI
- Rank
- 22
- Status
- Partial 1/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Score
- 39.7
- Last tested
- 2026-08-14
- Settings tested
- Intensive not supported; Balanced not supported
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; three distinct provider settings are not documented; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing; the official generation cohort is incomplete. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings
Reasoning field omitted
Checked on 2026-07-31 · Provider documentation
Scores from tested settings
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning field omitted | 39.7 | Tested and included | Baseline |
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Reasoning field omitted — tested and included
- Balanced: Not available for this model
- Intensive: Not available for this model
Player program results
Reasoning field omitted: 100% / 0% / 0% · n 1 Intensive not supportedBalanced not supportedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.0023
- Median estimated cost
- $0.0023
- Estimated range
- $0.0023–$0.0023
- Cost data
- 1 combinations / 1 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $0.0023
- Price source
- Combined: Recorded attempt + Standard list-price estimate
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-07-12 + boardgame-list-prices-2026-08-08
- Average output
- 2.0k tokens
- Output range
- 2.0k–2.0k tokens
- Samples
- 1
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt