Benchmark menu

Model results

Ling 3.0 Flash

See how Ling 3.0 Flash performed, which reasoning settings were tested, how often it produced a working player program, and what those runs cost.

Ling 3.0 Flash

Provider: InclusionAI

Rank
48
Status
Partial 2/3
Rank change
Baseline
Score
23.7
Last tested
2026-08-05
Settings tested
Missing Intensive

Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; the provider capability record is unavailable; generation-quality evidence is missing; generation quality is below the publication threshold; fixed opponent-and-seat coverage is incomplete. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.

Scores by reasoning setting

Reasoning-setting details were not recorded for this older result.

Player program results

Enabled: 7% / 33% / 60% · n 15None: 38% / 25% / 37% · n 16 Missing IntensiveMany programs failed

Generation cost

Average estimated cost
$0.00
Median estimated cost
$0.00
Estimated range
$0.00–$0.00
Cost data
16 combinations / 32 recorded runs
Observed total
$0.00
Price source
Provider-reported
Price list
Not recorded for this older data
Average output
34k tokens
Output range
2.0k–92k tokens
Samples
32

Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.

Test setup

  • Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
  • Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt