- Score · relative 0–100
- 33.3
- Rank
- —
- Status
- Provisional
- Players generated
- 2026-10-09
- Match evidence updated
- 2026-10-24
- Results published
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings and grouping
Available settings
Checked on 2026-10-09 · Provider documentation
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: Reasoning disabled — tested and included
- Balanced: Reasoning enabled — available, not tested in the current results
- Intensive: Not available for this model
Scores by game
What this result shows
Strongest included setting: Reasoning disabled (33.3).
Across included settings, only Tumbleweed has a game score (33.3). Each game counts every generation attempt, a failed one as 0. These are relative scores within each game, not direct comparisons of difficulty.
Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.
Test protocol and evidence limits
- Model identifier
- inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash
- Provider route (catalog)
- openrouter
- Prompt identity / profile
- Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
- Prompt version
- Not retained in this result set
- Generation policy
- Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
- Requested output-token limits
- 32768 (3 of 3 indexed attempts)
Generation evidence
- Reasoning disabled: 1 contributing player programs across 1 games
Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained.
| Game | Reasoning group | Programs | Working-program strength | Raw rating | Combined record (W / D / L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumbleweed | Baseline | 1 working of 1 attempt | 33.3 | 1206.4 | 22 / 287 / 229 |
Each row covers all the model's programs in one game and setting. Strength and raw rating are attempt-weighted means; under them, each program's score and the lowest and highest rating describe the programs (not a confidence interval). The combined record adds up their matches: evidence volume, not strength.
Failures and budgets
0 model-code generation failures; 0 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 0 recorded one-sided faults across contributing program rows. A crash or illegal move pinned on one program also counts as that program's loss in its match record; other faults, such as timeouts, are left out of rating evidence.
Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.
Player program results
Reasoning disabled: 100% / 0% / 0% · n 1 No Overall rankIntensive not supportedMissing BalancedGeneration cost
$0.00average estimated cost per game and reasoning setting
- Median
- $0.00
- Range
- $0.00–$0.00
- Provider-reported total
- $0.00
- Cost data
- 2 combinations · 2 runs
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-10-09
- Average output
- 20k tokens
- Output range
- 6.2k–33k tokens
- Runs with output-token data
- 2
How cost is measured
Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.
Test protocol
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Player-program generation; retained protocol details are under “Test protocol and evidence limits” above