Model results
LongCat 2.0
Provider: Other
- Rank
- 39
- Status
- Partial 2/3
- Rank change
- Baseline
- Score
- 32.5
- Last tested
- 2026-08-22
- Settings tested
- Intensive not supported
Why this result is partial: one or more bracket scores are missing; three distinct provider settings are not documented; one or more documented settings are untested or ineligible; generation-quality evidence is missing. The rank uses the available reasoning-setting results.
Scores by reasoning setting
Available settings
NoneEnabled
Checked on 2026-07-24 · Provider documentation
Scores from tested settings
| Tested setting | Score | Result status | Display group |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | 33.9 | Tested and included | Baseline |
| Enabled | 31.1 | Tested and included | Balanced |
How settings are grouped
- Baseline: None — tested and included
- Balanced: Enabled — tested and included
- Intensive: Not available for this model
Player program results
Enabled: 56% / 19% / 25% · n 16None: 50% / 38% / 12% · n 16 Intensive not supportedMany programs failedGeneration cost
- Average estimated cost
- $0.05
- Median estimated cost
- $0.04
- Estimated range
- $0.0064–$0.10
- Cost data
- 16 combinations / 32 recorded runs
- Observed total
- $1.60
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- Not recorded for this older data
- Average output
- 38k tokens
- Output range
- 2.1k–111k tokens
- Samples
- 32
Estimated cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination.
Test setup
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Uses the standard GameBench player-program prompt