- Score · relative 0–100
- 23.6
- Rank
- —
- Status
- Provisional
- Players generated
- 2026-10-24
- Match evidence updated
- 2026-10-24
- Results published
Scores by reasoning setting
Scores by game
What this result shows
No qualified setting comparison is retained.
Across included settings, the highest game score is Go (44.8); the lowest is Shogi (0.0). Each game counts every generation attempt, a failed one as 0. These are relative scores within each game, not direct comparisons of difficulty.
Match evidence measures these retained programs. It does not establish how a fresh generation will perform. Independent-generation variation is not estimated in this release.
Test protocol and evidence limits
- Model identifier
- recursive/flint-v1.0
- Provider route (catalog)
- Not retained in this result set
- Prompt identity / profile
- Not retained in this result set / Not retained in this result set
- Prompt version
- Not retained in this result set
- Generation policy
- Generation-quality admission policy (see methodology)
- Requested output-token limits
- 235929 (12 of 12 indexed attempts)
Generation evidence
Counts describe contributing programs, not independent replications: repairs and resends are not new independent samples. Independent-generation lineage is not retained.
| Game | Reasoning group | Programs | Working-program strength | Raw rating | Combined record (W / D / L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | Balanced | 1 working of 1 attempt | 44.8 | 1419.2 | 183 / 75 / 258 |
| Chess | Balanced | 1 working of 1 attempt | 35.1 | 1354.7 | 0 / 322 / 158 |
| Xiangqi | Balanced | 1 working of 1 attempt | 39.8 | 1395.5 | 23 / 334 / 141 |
| Hex | Balanced | 1 working of 1 attempt | 13.9 | 889.1 | 69 / 0 / 461 |
| International Draughts | Balanced | 1 working of 1 attempt | 17.0 | 910.1 | 71 / 2 / 429 |
| Game of the Amazons | Balanced | 1 working of 1 attempt | 10.3 | 843.0 | 47 / 0 / 483 |
| Tumbleweed | Balanced | 1 working of 1 attempt | 28.1 | 1149.1 | 139 / 0 / 399 |
Each row covers all the model's programs in one game and setting. Strength and raw rating are attempt-weighted means; under them, each program's score and the lowest and highest rating describe the programs (not a confidence interval). The combined record adds up their matches: evidence volume, not strength.
Failures and budgets
1 model-code generation failures; 0 provider/infrastructure failures excluded from the generation denominator. Runtime player faults are separate: 0 recorded one-sided faults across contributing program rows. A crash or illegal move pinned on one program also counts as that program's loss in its match record; other faults, such as timeouts, are left out of rating evidence.
Repair/resend outcomes and available costs are included. Exact retry ceilings and execution budgets are not retained in this result set; see the methodology for the public policy. Do not infer a measured setting from a current provider catalog.
Player program results
Enabled: 50% / 38% / 12% · n 8 No Overall rankMissing Intensive, BaselineGeneration cost
$0.00average estimated cost per game and reasoning setting
- Median
- $0.00
- Range
- $0.00–$0.00
- Provider-reported total
- $0.00
- Cost data
- 8 combinations · 8 runs
- Price source
- Provider-reported
- Price list
- boardgame-list-prices-2026-10-09
- Average output
- 24k tokens
- Output range
- 14k–45k tokens
- Runs with output-token data
- 8
How cost is measured
Comparison cost gives equal weight to each model, game, and reasoning-setting combination. Recorded generation attempts include repairs and resends when cost evidence is available; runtime compute and service operation are excluded. Cost and output-token counts use separate telemetry denominators. A list-price estimate is not actual expenditure; mixed evidence is not a uniform standard-price comparison.
Test protocol
- Combines this model's tested reasoning settings
- Player-program generation; retained protocol details are under “Test protocol and evidence limits” above